Well John, though I agree with you that I don't hate four strokes, I just prefer 2 strokes (2t); I think the point the others are saying is this. If you are going to post an interview of a track owner praising the benefits and joys of two strokes, and how 4 strokes (4t) have hurt his business, having him say at the end "I ride a 4t, we all do..." kind of ruins the validity of the interview to me. If he loves them as much as he says, and if 4t's really are that damaging to his livelihood, he should be supporting 2t by riding one. Only getting to ride a few times a year certainly sucks, but I took a ten (10) year hiatus from dirt riding, jumped back on a KX125 and have had zero problems with the re-learning curve. And 125's are not exactly to tool of choice for tight PA trails, lol. He could sell his 4t, buy a nice modern 2t and do just as well, because in my opinion a properly tuned and set-up 2t really isn't hard to ride. Think about it, 15 years ago before the 4t "invasion", what did all the inexperienced races ride? Yep, 2t. If they learned on them back then, why can't they learn on them now?
I am not saying 4t should go away, I am just trying to show you the other side of your logic. I liked the interview and think he seems like a nice, cool guy. I just wish if he was really sincere about his preference for 2t's, that he would have left that part of his interview out.