It's fairly simple.
A 2ts "valves", when looked at / using a description that a 4t person can understand, is the piston. Reed, disc and exhaust power valves / trapping valves are but a small part ( but, important ) of a 2ts "valve train".
The "lift, duration,opening and closing" of the "valve" is controlled by the length of stroke / width of the bore on a 2t. And these have very definite limitations.
DFI and many of the other ways fuel delivery that can / might be put into use on 2ts, has the ability to get much better fuel delivery and retention within the combustion chamber - Quicker and more efficient charging.
This brings the possibility for shorter bore / stroke ratios, bringing in the time old use of more revs for more power. And an appreciable 'spread' of a 2ts torque/power curves.
All of the above is fairly simplistic in the writing, but correct. I, and a few others here, I think, could get into a lot of mathematical and engineering details, but come up with the same end point.
2ts, with the development they have so long been starved of, will become better things, in All ways.
Looked at in realistic terms - 4ts have more to be worried about when it comes to being the first of the extinct ICE engine formats than 2ts. At some stage, engineering and total environmental / energy costs cannot be ignored by ICE producers.