Well, I don't have quite the time or knowledge to write a complete history tonight... or... this morning, but here's some things just based on your post.
First, the Magnum thing. The all-new Magnum engine debuted for the 1978 model-year as a 250, 400, and 440. That continued unchanged (I think) through 1980. In 1981, the 440 was replaced with the 490 (a simple bore job (so to speak)) and there may have been some other tweaks. I know the early Magnum engines used a three-row primary chain (except the 250 which used a two-row) but then in 1981 that was changed to two completely independent chains on all models. I'm not sure of what other changes may have been made, that's just one I've heard about and can recognize from the exploded-view diagrams on Opferman's site. After 1982, another all-new engine was introduced in 1983, although the bore x stroke remained unchanged and remained so all the way until the blue Maicos, I think. This new engine used a geared primary drive, a more conventional clutch, and only two shafts in the transmission rather than three like the Magnum engine had. It also introduced a reed-valve for the first time on a big-bore Maico (reeds hit the 250 in '81) and was of course also the last model-year before the bankruptcy of 1983.
As for chassis development, I'm not a big expert on the pre-76 models, but I've seen enough of the rest to be pretty solid on them. 1976 was the first year for the fancy-looking "cantilever" frame, which was carried over to the 1977 model. The Magnums had a very similar frame that looks absolutely identical, but I've heard that the dimensions on this frame were changed a bit from the previous 76-77 model, which would make sense given how radically different the engine's dimensions and center-of-gravity had become. Suspension travel was 10" front and back on 78 and 79 Magnums. In 1980, an all-new frame was developed that gave over 12" of travel front and back, without pushing the seat height into the clouds. This, however, created an awkward riding position that felt like one was in the middle of a banana, so in 1981 they slightly decreased suspension travel (measure that one with a microscope) while tweaking the frame to bring the seat up a bit, so the distance between seat- and bar-height wasn't so crazy. 1982 brought yet another new frame to make way for the new monoshock design. Then in 1983, even THAT was thrown entirely out the window for the new 1983 frame which was again quite different (first non-double-downtube frame from Maico in as long as I can think back, splitting from a single tube into a double in the style of modern frames).