Again, we can say it over and over, and some don't ever get it. He is comparing a 450cc motorcycle to a 250cc. When the 2 strokes get a fair hand, we will see what is said. I heard one good thing about the 4 stroke in the video about getting traction, but everything else he said, he praised the 2 stroke. When they start comparing 250F's and saying they are better than the 250 2 stroke, I will bow. Did you not notice how that track was setup like the new tracks are now? Setup for slow turning 4 strokes. He even mentioned that. Everything has been setup for the 4 strokes. If things were fair, tracks, cc's etc, we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Oh, wait, Cedric just won on a tight track... If you don't agree, than you are my friend are definitely not pro 2 stroke.
So on record, FUN is the word from the Pro's and retired pros. Langston, Mcgrath, RC, JS, etc. So what is the 450F? Gets the job done, but is boring?
I don't think Charles is banning anyone, for exactly what you said, no name calling etc. Just disagreeing. But when a person rides a 4 stroke, when a person defends a 4 stroke, when a person oh wait, that was about a duck I think.
For the record: I have yet for someone on the 4 stroke side of the equation, to bring up how much better a 250F is than the 250 2 stroke... It's always 450F this 450F that. Of course, it's almost twice the size.