Home
Articles
Features
Tech
News
Editorials
Race Recaps
Videos
Archive
Features
Tech
News
Editorials
Race Recaps
Videos
Reviews
For Sale
Directory
Vintage
ID Decoder
Technology Study
Possible Classes
Events
Forum
Coming Soon
Home
> Forum
News:
Be sure to find us on fb,Twitter and YouTube!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Two Stroke Motocross
»
Two Stroke Motocross Forum
»
General Two Stroke Talk
»
Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923? (Read 3362 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Charles Owens
Professional
Posts: 756
Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923?
«
on:
December 01, 2010, 02:38:11 PM »
Pretty good article.
http://oldbike.wordpress.com/1923-hobart-mckenzie-169cc-2-stroke/
Logged
Two Stroke Motocross
Power Play MotorSports
http://www.facebook.com/TwoStrokeMotocross
http://www.facebook.com/PowerPlayMotorSports
http://facebook.com/CharlesTOwens
http://www.VXCS.org
SachsGS
Professional
Posts: 1235
Re: Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923?
«
Reply #1 on:
December 02, 2010, 08:41:01 AM »
Two stroke Scott motorcycles from the 30's were already watercooled.
Logged
G-MONEY
Expert
Posts: 150
LET'R BUCK
Re: Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923?
«
Reply #2 on:
December 02, 2010, 10:32:55 AM »
Is that headlamp oil fired? It looks like it a miner's unit. I really dig the handle bar controlled decompressor.
Logged
"Everthing's the same just slightly different"
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Two Stroke Motocross
»
Two Stroke Motocross Forum
»
General Two Stroke Talk
»
Two strokes - Cheap and Reliable, even in 1923?