Coming Soon
Home > Forum


Author Topic: 2001 KX250 mods and performance  (Read 18077 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JohnN

  • Professional
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
  • Two Strokes Rule!
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2010, 04:28:20 AM »
The easy answer is no, they won't fit....  :(
Life is short.

Smile while you still have teeth!

Offline Swimr2DaResQ

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 137
  • Awww Yeaah!!!
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2010, 06:11:28 PM »
Ok, thanks for the input!
"Technology frightens me to death. It's designed by engineers to impress other engineers, and they always come with instruction booklets that are written by engineers for other engineers - which is why almost no technology ever works."

Offline Chokey

  • Intermediate
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2010, 06:20:07 PM »
Does anyone know if the 03'-07' kx 250 plastics will fit the 99'-02' kx 250. I want to "pimp my ride," just a little face lift! 8)
The only part that will fit is the front fender, and even that won't match up with the '99-'02 number plate. Sorry, the plastics can't be made to interchange, they are just too different. The '03 and up uses the rear fender and side panels to make part of the air box, the tank is very different so the shrouds won't fit, and the tank won't fit the older frame. It just won't work.

Offline dogger315

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #18 on: February 06, 2010, 12:44:44 PM »
Quote
I think I will have to try another pipe!
Only if you are unhappy with your current setup.  In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with the FMF SST pipe as long as you use the recommended silencer - SST or Titanium 2.  I have used just about every pipe and silencer combination made over the years and the SST compares favorably with the best of them.

I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade, but you have to remember, opinions are like belly buttons, everybody has one.  When you get information from the internet, treat it as just another source (especially when it's anonymous) and combine that with what you here from your riding buddies, the local pro, etc., and most importantly, what you can see and tell from the "seat of your pants". Then try to make an "informed" decision.  

Here is a link to a website with some other riders opinions on the SST:
http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=565192

And as if that wasn't enough ;D, here are some more opinions for you.  Don't use ATF in your transmission.  ATF is designed for automotive automatic transmissions that have extemely small passages.  As a result, it doesn't provide the surface adhesion and as a result, the cushoining needed for your application.  ATF was widely used back in the day because a racer had a choice of ATF or petroleum based automotive motor oil.  The ATF was the least offensive of the two.  For proof, try this test.  Pour a little ATF in your hand and move it around with your fingers.  Now pour a little quality tranny oil (Redline, Maxima, etc.) and do the same.  Notice a difference?  That extra "heft" is very important for the care and well being of your transmission.

Finally, the VForce 3 reed is as good as it gets.  I have run both the Boyesen and the Moto Tassinari on numerous engine builds. Both provide nice gains.  The Rad Valve is easier to install (no modifications required since it includes the intake manifold) but cost much more.  The VForce requires modifications on some applications but cost less.  It all boils down to which one YOU like the best.  

That KX is a great bike with an awesome engine.  That PWKS carb is still state of the art, I run them on my racing CRs.  Sounds like you are doing everything right.  If the bike is starting to feel a little weaker, try a compression test.  If you get less than 165, it's getting time for a new top end.  Like i said, you should ask around and try to verify everything I said before making a decision.  After all, it's just another opinion.

Main thing is have fun and take good care of your Kawi, it's an iconic model like the '01 CR250 Honda or the '03 YZ250 Yamaha.

dogger  
 
« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 12:49:39 PM by dogger315 »

Offline juliend

  • Intermediate
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #19 on: February 06, 2010, 01:50:08 PM »
Quote
And as if that wasn't enough Grin, here are some more opinions for you.  Don't use ATF in your transmission.  ATF is designed for automotive automatic transmissions that have extemely small passages.  As a result, it doesn't provide the surface adhesion and as a result, the cushoining needed for your application.  ATF was widely used back in the day because a racer had a choice of ATF or petroleum based automotive motor oil.  The ATF was the least offensive of the two.  For proof, try this test.  Pour a little ATF in your hand and move it around with your fingers.  Now pour a little quality tranny oil (Redline, Maxima, etc.) and do the same.  Notice a difference?  That extra "heft" is very important for the care and well being of your transmission.

Can't wait for some responses on that one. I'll just answer it with a question. Do you think the constant mesh gears in your bike are dealing with more force than say, a Ford F350 automatic transmission?

Offline TotalNZ

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 247
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #20 on: February 06, 2010, 02:06:35 PM »
Quote
And as if that wasn't enough Grin, here are some more opinions for you.  Don't use ATF in your transmission.  ATF is designed for automotive automatic transmissions that have extemely small passages.  As a result, it doesn't provide the surface adhesion and as a result, the cushoining needed for your application.  ATF was widely used back in the day because a racer had a choice of ATF or petroleum based automotive motor oil.  The ATF was the least offensive of the two.  For proof, try this test.  Pour a little ATF in your hand and move it around with your fingers.  Now pour a little quality tranny oil (Redline, Maxima, etc.) and do the same.  Notice a difference?  That extra "heft" is very important for the care and well being of your transmission.

Can't wait for some responses on that one. I'll just answer it with a question. Do you think the constant mesh gears in your bike are dealing with more force than say, a Ford F350 automatic transmission?
Excellent point, enough said.

Offline dogger315

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2010, 03:49:21 PM »
Quote
Can't wait for some responses on that one.
To all the other PEs out there, I welcome any informed rebuttal. 

I don't want to waste my time generating a response so I'll let the good folks at AMSOIL list the perils of using ATF in a wet clutch motorcycle transmission:

"Viscosity is the most important characteristic of a lubricant. Motorcycle gears create a shearing effect that causes permanent oil viscosity loss. This thinning effect reduces the oil's ability to prevent metal-to-metal contact and wear. The stability and natural operating temperature ranges of the premium synthetic base stocks used to formulate AMSOIL Synthetic Motorcycle Oils eliminate shear and reduce wear. AMSOIL Synthetic Motorcycle Oils exhibit absolute shear stability as measured by the Kurt Orbon shear stability test."

AMSOIL Synthetic Universal Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C, cSt (ASTM D-445) 32.4 
AMSOIL SAE 10W-40 Synthetic Motorcycle Oil (MCF) Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C, cSt (ASTM D-445)  93.36. 
High Shear Viscosity @ 150°C , 1.0 x 106 s-1 (ASTM D 4683), cP 4.52 (Kurt Orbon test)
I direct your attention to the 93.36 rating of the made for motorcycles MCF along with the respectable shear rating of 4.52 vs the 32.4 viscosity rating and no shear rating for the ATF.
 
In addition to the above good news about ATF, over the years, new and improved ATFs have been developed to meet the changing demands of newer ATs.  For instance, type f and the newer type fa has more friction modifiers for Ford transmissions.  Dexron was actually developed for a softer shift feel.  The newer versions dexron III, merconV, Toyota type4, etc., were all developed for specific problems that arose from newer model transmissions (torque converter shudder,slow flow rate thru valve-body&solenoid packs,etc..).  So, in a nutshell, you don't know what you are getting since nobody has ever conducted any performance or compatibility test on ATF in motorcycle transmissions.

At the risk of repeating myself, ATF is designed only to satisfy the performance designs/goals of a automatic automotive transmission, not the demands of a motorcycle gearbox.   

One last "jewel" I'll leave you with.  Some ATFs will swell/soften rubber components and others will shrink/harden them - watch out for those seals!

dogger

 

Offline juliend

  • Intermediate
  • ***
  • Posts: 78
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #22 on: February 06, 2010, 04:29:01 PM »
Uh huh. I read that as "ATF is no good, buy our oil @ $10 a quart please."  ;D

*edit*

The above is admittedly a lame response. I felt the need to elaborate.

Note that amsoil themselves do not apply a shear strength rating to THIER atf? I find that interesting. I don't think viscosity is as important here. Shear strength would be. No amount of oil manufacturer's jargon will change the fact that both automatic transmissions AND dirt bike transmissions use constant gear mesh. You can go 75,000 miles on an automatic transmission without service to the transmission fluid or filter. I find it hard to believe that a dirt bike can put more force on those gears than my 5,000lb truck does.

I'm no engineer, just an old shadetree mechanic. I've been running ATF in my 2 stroke trannies for nearly 20 years and have never had any transmission failure, nor have I ever replaced any transmission gears or components due to abnormal wear. That alone is evidence enough for me.

« Last Edit: February 06, 2010, 06:34:09 PM by juliend »

Offline Chokey

  • Intermediate
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #23 on: February 07, 2010, 04:11:31 PM »


I'm no engineer, just an old shadetree mechanic. I've been running ATF in my 2 stroke trannies for nearly 20 years and have never had any transmission failure, nor have I ever replaced any transmission gears or components due to abnormal wear. That alone is evidence enough for me.


I completely concur. I've been using it myself for over twenty years, and not only have their been no issues, I prefer the way it makes the clutch feel. And there's just way too much anecdotal evidence from thousands of riders that run ATF with no problems for me to believe it's unsuitable for our trannies. The simple truth for our trannies is that how often you change it is more important than what you put in it.

Offline dogger315

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #24 on: February 08, 2010, 11:26:04 AM »
Quote
The above is admittedly a lame response.
Those aren't the words I would use since the ATF and MCF I used for the comparison both cost $10/qt.

Quote
I'm no engineer
I am, and I certainly didn't intend to hijack this thread (sorry Swimr2DaResQ), to enter into a circular debate. 
You are certainly entitled to your opinion just like you are free to run clam chowder in your transmission if
you like - I hear the Abu Dabu MX team has been using it for twenty years without a single failure.

Quote
I prefer the way it makes the clutch feel.
Quote
The simple truth for our trannies is that how often you change it is more important than what you put in it.
You are correct on both statements.  If you feel compelled to run ATF, "it does improve clutch feel as long
as you know it is a change after every ride proposition."  Eric Gorr

dogger

Offline Swimr2DaResQ

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 137
  • Awww Yeaah!!!
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #25 on: February 08, 2010, 07:27:51 PM »
Awesome, good debate!
 
I like to see this stuff on the forums and hear all the opinions.
I appreciate all the different points of view and the shared experience.
 Thanks for all the info and input!
As far as the sst pipe is concerned, I love the powerband now, I will try other pipes in the near future, but the almighty $ is limiting that one right now. I plan on rebuilding the top end in a week or two, go Tax Return!!!

On a different note, has anyone used Moose Racing rims, or Excel, and how do they compare?
I have heard lots of negative things about Pro wheels and Warp 9.

Swimr 
"Technology frightens me to death. It's designed by engineers to impress other engineers, and they always come with instruction booklets that are written by engineers for other engineers - which is why almost no technology ever works."

Offline admiral

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #26 on: February 09, 2010, 07:09:03 AM »
always remember that a proper oil thread must degenerate into personal attacks. otherwise what's the point? :D

Offline JohnN

  • Professional
  • *****
  • Posts: 1583
  • Two Strokes Rule!
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #27 on: February 09, 2010, 02:55:18 PM »
always remember that a proper oil thread must degenerate into personal attacks. otherwise what's the point? :D

Said with tongue firmly planted in cheek!  :P :P :P

This place is just "different".... I know I learn a lot and it's great to hear differing opinions w using experience and facts as it's known to each racer. After all there's more than one way to do everything in life...

Life is short.

Smile while you still have teeth!

Offline dogger315

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2010, 09:36:05 AM »
Quote
has anyone used Moose Racing rims, or Excel, and how do they compare?
I have extensive experience with Excels and Dirt Stars, both are very good.  I have
friends who use Moose and they love them.  The Moose rims run a little cheaper
than the other brands.  Make sure you use quality spokes to add strength and
durablity.  I have used, and can recommend Buchanan and Excel SS spokes.  Be
aware that if you mix and match, you may have to drill the hubs or the rims to
fit.

The latest wheelset I built used OEM hubs, Buchanan SS spokes and nipples and
DID Dirt Star LT-X rims.  I had to drill the spoke holes on the front rim to fit the
larger nipples and had to drill the rear hub to fit the larger spokes.  The wheels
are super strong and about the same weight as stock.

Here is a picture of the completed front wheel


I don't have any experience or know anyone that runs Warp 9 or Pro.

dogger

Offline Swimr2DaResQ

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 137
  • Awww Yeaah!!!
    • View Profile
Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2010, 06:12:56 PM »
Thanks Dogger,
      I have ordered Buchanan SS Spokes( heard nothing but great things about them too), and Because of the Cash factor I'm going to try the moose rims and stick with my stock hubs, that are in really good shape!
I looked at the DID Dirt Star, Excel A60 and Takasago and  I'd like to try them out sometime too.
Anyways, Thanks for the info,
    Swimr ;)
"Technology frightens me to death. It's designed by engineers to impress other engineers, and they always come with instruction booklets that are written by engineers for other engineers - which is why almost no technology ever works."