1
General Two Stroke Talk / TRIBORON!!!!!!
« on: May 13, 2013, 08:43:48 PM »
Thanks, I do ride (a 250sx) too you know
Like the Phoenix rising from the ashes Two Stroke Motocross is reborn!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

If you are injecting into the combustion chamber after the exhaust port is closed (in theory anyway),why would you need an expansion chamber exhaust?Because you inject fuel only, -cant get much of a fire without air.
Theoretically a Direct Injection equipped 2T would not require an expansion chamber but this is still an issue with a FI 2T.MRHP, when you refer to the pipe heating up and "Altering the scavenging pulses" is this due to the pipe physically enlarging?A bit of topic, but I just cant resist this DI not needing a pipe stuff
I've ridden many 2T dirt bikes where the jetting changes with clouds blowing over.I'd rather move in the direction of FI.![]()

), and you will get similar results regardless of DI, FI or carb.My take on that quote is that the PC pipe added 1/2hp peak, i.e. 50.5hp total.I think you may need to re read the article, the stock bike made 50 hp, the pipe didnt add any hp to this peak, however it allowed it to make 7 hp more
MXA page 66 says in stock trim the KTM peaks at 50hp @ 8400rpm.
Pro Circuit pipe adds 1/2 hp @ 8500rpm and 5 1/4 @ 9000rpm and "an amazing 7 horses more at 9500rpm" ( I think they meant a total of 7hp).
The Pro Circuit pipe makes more power even though the rpms are higher but in stock trim it only makes 50hp peak as in no more power at any rpm. The article also stated that just adding the Pro Circuit silencer would give you 2 more horse from 8600rpm to 10,000rpm. I interpret that to mean it makes more power not just moving the powerband around?
Not sure I understand your response?
I would provide links for both MXA articles but they seem to be magazine only as I could not find them online at MXA.
2) with no unburnt fuel and air escaping out the pipe will there still be a need for an expansion chamber?
For the two-stroke in the developing nations, it's already there. -Google "Envirofit two-stroke". Otherwise I agree with the quote from TMKIWI above.QuoteI agree with 2T in that if DI makes it to bikes the last we will see is a 125.
If we do get DI it will start with relatively low reving large capacity off road bikes first.
For once, I have to disagree with you. I think we will see it on the SMALLER engines first. The Lawn and Garden industries will be hit hardest with any change in the emissions laws as the marine and motorcycle industries have adapted to 4$ or DI already. 2T motorcycles in the first world countries are a very small percentage and would not put up much of a fight if they were legislated away. However, in the third world (or more PC: Developing Nations), the small bore 2T is the predominant form of transportation and a large contributor to the emissions pollution. That is where DI will have the biggest effect.
Yes, there are engineering challenges, but nothing that can't be overcome. Only the cost/desire limit it.I don't think 2TI want to be linked to that quote, if for noting else, my less than perfect English
2TInstitute: You answered your own question.QuoteOn the other hand Ski-Doo seems to have solved that part of the puzzle as well with their E-tech's.
Why not explain thenQuote... without a complicated big end/main bearing oiling/cooling system...
It doesn't have to be complicate. It just has to be wet. Oiling the mains has nothing to do with the emissions. It's just another part of the process because of the scavenging effect.
Cars, boats, and other engines are using EFI and DFI. Only cost and people unwilling to change are holding back the 2T Motorcycle.
I don't think your grasping the concept of what fuel does in the crankcase.

TMKIWI - that's why Evinrude didnt consult you when they were designing their oversquare DI engine. But i admit, i should have said DI's are no longer "fully" dependant on port timing. When the injector releases its spray into the combustion chamber is now at the discretion of the engineer, not the pistonI'll try again...
<snip>Could you please explain how DI could accomplish such a thing?
And THAT is the beauty of direct injection. Because now, 2 strokes can be oversquare!! They no longer need to depend on port timing like conventional 2 strokes.
<snip>
To clarify, I read 2 stroke SX models to get linkage, exc models to remain pds.Got that, but found it interesting that they developed a whole new PDS frame from the 350EXC. -350SX has linkage..
The way i understand it, is the difficulty in getting the necessary information to the computer, how do you monitor the fuel air mixture and prevent a lean situation. I'm thinking the usual sensors wouldn't cut it ie lambda probe or air flow meter. I'm thinking it would be very hard to manage, especially with the more variable throttle input and direct drive nature of dirtbikes.Food for thought: What information does the carb have access to?