Coming Soon
Home > Forum


Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dogger315

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14
166
Technical / Re: two stroke porting
« on: March 04, 2010, 09:03:13 AM »
I agree with the other two responses and would add that your "cut down"
silencer will also boost low end at the expense of top end power.  If you
look at SX specific silencers, they are all shortys to help provide that big
hit at the bottom.  Conversly, an "outdoors" style silencer is normal length
for better top end.  If you like FMF, I recommend a Fatty or SST pipe and
a Powercore 2 silencer.  The right pipe and silencer combination along with
a good functioning power valve will wake up the already stout RM power
band.

dogger
 

167
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: My final CR500AF
« on: February 17, 2010, 05:00:20 PM »
Quote
Although not sure how you will use those graphics?
They won't be exactly those same graphics.  I plan to use just the
wing and Honda logo portion and have them recreated on 12 mil
clear backgrounds.  I'm looking to recreate a facsimile of the '92 to
'94 factory Honda graphics.  Those bikes sported a white Honda
wing with "Honda" spelled out below on the shrouds.  Here's a
picture.  This is what I plan to run on the '93 CR250 I'm building
minus the "camel" logo which was only used in Supercross.

Because of the shape of the 2010 bikes shrouds, I can't use the same
graphic.  The One DB or standard Honda graphic kit was designed to fit
and will still provide the look I'm after.

dogger



 

168
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: Project Two 50
« on: February 17, 2010, 10:00:41 AM »
Quote
We are working with a local Pro racer by the name of Mike Leavitt.
Good choice IMO. 

dogger

169
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: My final CR500AF
« on: February 17, 2010, 09:54:39 AM »
She's a beauty.  I really like the One Industries DB shroud graphics.  I plan
to use them on my 500AF on the OE red shrouds - a really nice take on
the Honda wing.

Quote
will try to get out with my friends 08 CRF450 and compare them.
I already know what the outcome of that one will be - see ya!

Again, great job!

dogger

170
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: My final CR500AF
« on: February 15, 2010, 08:58:06 AM »
Quote
All efforts are now going to be spent trying to start a new motocross national series.
Now that's a worthwhile endeavor!

dogger

171
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: My final CR500AF
« on: February 13, 2010, 08:26:50 AM »
Quote
The whole deal on this tribute bike, is to make 3 late model tribute bikes for the fallen
A nice gesture.  I look forward to seeing the finished products.

dogger

172
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: need help, lets hear it!!!
« on: February 12, 2010, 06:25:07 PM »
Quote
i found that it vibrated more in the alluminum frame.
That's not what I wanted to hear.  I still plan to buy one mostly
because I don't know how much longer they will be around.

My goal is to do everything I can to make the bike easier to
ride fast and for a long time (30 minutes).  Crank balancing,
250 ignition and flywheel, foam filled frame, lower compression
and higher gearing to smooth out the hit, etc.  The bike will be
an open class test bed.

There is no getting around the power to weight ratio (that's the
best part).  The trick is to get more of that power to the ground
without overly abusing the rider.

Should be an interesting and fun project.

Quote
now that i can ride in the 250f class with the 250 2t im all over that.
Amen to that.  Let the fun begin.

dogger
 

173
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: My final CR500AF
« on: February 12, 2010, 03:05:14 PM »
Quote
Should get the radiator back from the welder today
Having them enlarged or repaired?

Are you going to do the whole tribute route with the
powder coated frame etc.?

dogger

174
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: need help, lets hear it!!!
« on: February 12, 2010, 02:40:24 PM »
Quote
A new from the ground up 500 using 2010 technology i bet would be far easier to ride.
 
I agree with you.  That's why I want to purchase a CR500AF, to test that theory out.

Quote
Anyway this is Rock solid to ride stock or to build up to any level.
 
Good move switching from the 450F.  That YZ is about as good as it gets these days. 
It was winning shootouts long before the others quit making theirs.

dogger

175
Technical / Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« on: February 10, 2010, 09:36:05 AM »
Quote
has anyone used Moose Racing rims, or Excel, and how do they compare?
I have extensive experience with Excels and Dirt Stars, both are very good.  I have
friends who use Moose and they love them.  The Moose rims run a little cheaper
than the other brands.  Make sure you use quality spokes to add strength and
durablity.  I have used, and can recommend Buchanan and Excel SS spokes.  Be
aware that if you mix and match, you may have to drill the hubs or the rims to
fit.

The latest wheelset I built used OEM hubs, Buchanan SS spokes and nipples and
DID Dirt Star LT-X rims.  I had to drill the spoke holes on the front rim to fit the
larger nipples and had to drill the rear hub to fit the larger spokes.  The wheels
are super strong and about the same weight as stock.

Here is a picture of the completed front wheel


I don't have any experience or know anyone that runs Warp 9 or Pro.

dogger

176
Technical / Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« on: February 08, 2010, 11:26:04 AM »
Quote
The above is admittedly a lame response.
Those aren't the words I would use since the ATF and MCF I used for the comparison both cost $10/qt.

Quote
I'm no engineer
I am, and I certainly didn't intend to hijack this thread (sorry Swimr2DaResQ), to enter into a circular debate. 
You are certainly entitled to your opinion just like you are free to run clam chowder in your transmission if
you like - I hear the Abu Dabu MX team has been using it for twenty years without a single failure.

Quote
I prefer the way it makes the clutch feel.
Quote
The simple truth for our trannies is that how often you change it is more important than what you put in it.
You are correct on both statements.  If you feel compelled to run ATF, "it does improve clutch feel as long
as you know it is a change after every ride proposition."  Eric Gorr

dogger

177
Technical / Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« on: February 06, 2010, 03:49:21 PM »
Quote
Can't wait for some responses on that one.
To all the other PEs out there, I welcome any informed rebuttal. 

I don't want to waste my time generating a response so I'll let the good folks at AMSOIL list the perils of using ATF in a wet clutch motorcycle transmission:

"Viscosity is the most important characteristic of a lubricant. Motorcycle gears create a shearing effect that causes permanent oil viscosity loss. This thinning effect reduces the oil's ability to prevent metal-to-metal contact and wear. The stability and natural operating temperature ranges of the premium synthetic base stocks used to formulate AMSOIL Synthetic Motorcycle Oils eliminate shear and reduce wear. AMSOIL Synthetic Motorcycle Oils exhibit absolute shear stability as measured by the Kurt Orbon shear stability test."

AMSOIL Synthetic Universal Automatic Transmission Fluid (ATF) Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C, cSt (ASTM D-445) 32.4 
AMSOIL SAE 10W-40 Synthetic Motorcycle Oil (MCF) Kinematic Viscosity @ 40°C, cSt (ASTM D-445)  93.36. 
High Shear Viscosity @ 150°C , 1.0 x 106 s-1 (ASTM D 4683), cP 4.52 (Kurt Orbon test)
I direct your attention to the 93.36 rating of the made for motorcycles MCF along with the respectable shear rating of 4.52 vs the 32.4 viscosity rating and no shear rating for the ATF.
 
In addition to the above good news about ATF, over the years, new and improved ATFs have been developed to meet the changing demands of newer ATs.  For instance, type f and the newer type fa has more friction modifiers for Ford transmissions.  Dexron was actually developed for a softer shift feel.  The newer versions dexron III, merconV, Toyota type4, etc., were all developed for specific problems that arose from newer model transmissions (torque converter shudder,slow flow rate thru valve-body&solenoid packs,etc..).  So, in a nutshell, you don't know what you are getting since nobody has ever conducted any performance or compatibility test on ATF in motorcycle transmissions.

At the risk of repeating myself, ATF is designed only to satisfy the performance designs/goals of a automatic automotive transmission, not the demands of a motorcycle gearbox.   

One last "jewel" I'll leave you with.  Some ATFs will swell/soften rubber components and others will shrink/harden them - watch out for those seals!

dogger

 

178
Technical / Re: 2001 KX250 mods and performance
« on: February 06, 2010, 12:44:44 PM »
Quote
I think I will have to try another pipe!
Only if you are unhappy with your current setup.  In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with the FMF SST pipe as long as you use the recommended silencer - SST or Titanium 2.  I have used just about every pipe and silencer combination made over the years and the SST compares favorably with the best of them.

I don't mean to rain on anyone's parade, but you have to remember, opinions are like belly buttons, everybody has one.  When you get information from the internet, treat it as just another source (especially when it's anonymous) and combine that with what you here from your riding buddies, the local pro, etc., and most importantly, what you can see and tell from the "seat of your pants". Then try to make an "informed" decision.  

Here is a link to a website with some other riders opinions on the SST:
http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=565192

And as if that wasn't enough ;D, here are some more opinions for you.  Don't use ATF in your transmission.  ATF is designed for automotive automatic transmissions that have extemely small passages.  As a result, it doesn't provide the surface adhesion and as a result, the cushoining needed for your application.  ATF was widely used back in the day because a racer had a choice of ATF or petroleum based automotive motor oil.  The ATF was the least offensive of the two.  For proof, try this test.  Pour a little ATF in your hand and move it around with your fingers.  Now pour a little quality tranny oil (Redline, Maxima, etc.) and do the same.  Notice a difference?  That extra "heft" is very important for the care and well being of your transmission.

Finally, the VForce 3 reed is as good as it gets.  I have run both the Boyesen and the Moto Tassinari on numerous engine builds. Both provide nice gains.  The Rad Valve is easier to install (no modifications required since it includes the intake manifold) but cost much more.  The VForce requires modifications on some applications but cost less.  It all boils down to which one YOU like the best.  

That KX is a great bike with an awesome engine.  That PWKS carb is still state of the art, I run them on my racing CRs.  Sounds like you are doing everything right.  If the bike is starting to feel a little weaker, try a compression test.  If you get less than 165, it's getting time for a new top end.  Like i said, you should ask around and try to verify everything I said before making a decision.  After all, it's just another opinion.

Main thing is have fun and take good care of your Kawi, it's an iconic model like the '01 CR250 Honda or the '03 YZ250 Yamaha.

dogger  
 

179
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: need help, lets hear it!!!
« on: February 06, 2010, 09:54:40 AM »
Quote
i was suprised to see the stock Mikuni carb on that fancy bike. i thought a 38 PWK would have been used. did you do any testing with one?
Good catch admiral.  Actually I did test several different carbs.  These pictures were taken right after
the bike was completed.  Quite a few changes were made throughout the season.  I tried and liked the
Keihin 38mm PWK quad vent air striker better then the TMX but the final carb was a "boutique" Keihin
PWK with TPS and a power valve.  That carb was programmed via a ton of testing and a JD dual map
ignition to provide a start powerband and, through the flick of a handlebar mounted switch after rounding
the first turn, a "rest of the race" powerband.  The carb also performed better across the board than any
other carb I tried.

Quote
as much as i love open 2T bikes they get harder to race the older you get.
Man, that is a true statement.  I have never been so hammered as I was after every open
class race I competed in.  Even if you are a naturally smooth rider, those bikes will beat you
up and it only gets worse with age.  I love riding the big two strokes, but if I ever raced one
again, it would be the only class I would enter that day - just for the extra recovery time
between motos.

dogger

180
General Two Stroke Talk / Re: need help, lets hear it!!!
« on: February 05, 2010, 09:49:15 AM »
Quote
I rode just a few races because I wasn't comfortable with the bike, I'd lost the joy to ride
That's a pretty good summary of the way I felt, ferrahout.  I had never raced/ridden anything but two
strokes off road and could never get comfortable on a four stroke.  It was a lot less fun for sure.

Quote
How many National events did you compete in?
John, as you know, I raced my first event as a pro in '79 so I am definitely on the back side of Jody's
(Weisel) speed bell curve.  My pro/Nationals days are a distant memory now.
Quote
how did you do when you switched to the four-stroke?
More bad than good.  I couldn't come to terms with the extra weight and engine braking aspects compared
to the CR I just jumped off of.  I spent a lot of money putting the CRF on a diet and added a slipper clutch
to help make the bike behave more like my CRs but it was a lost cause and I found I began to lose my
enthusiasm for racing and as a result, my training and ultimately my speed dropped off.  Looking back on
it, the decision to switch was a big, costly (time and money) mistake.
Quote
And what did it cost you to set up the four-stroke?
I left the engines mostly stock (it had plenty of power).  I added a White Bros Carbon Pro exhaust, a Twin
Air Power Flow Filter kit and, since I was racing amateur, VP U2 oxygenated fuel.  The above mods were
good for about 6 more hp.  I spent the biggest bucks on lightening the bike by replacing every thing made
from steel with carbon fiber or titanium.  I bolted on a Pro Circuit "Works" suspension, oversized disc rotors
(to help slow the pig down) and a bunch of little items to help with hot starts and to make the bike fit
better.  Totals including the cost of a new bike each year, ranged from $19,000 in '04 to $21,000 in '06.
The big wammy was the cost of maintenance and replacement parts needed during a normal season of
racing.  That budget was more than double what I spent racing CRs and engine reliabilty/duarability was
still poor.
Quote
It is kinda jacked up that PC doesn't include ti springs on ther "works" suspension
I don't have a problem with that.  The Ti springs react a little different than a steel spring of the
same weight.  Switching between the two gives me just another option to dial it in.  I am greatfull
companies like Pro Circuit are offering this level of suspension to the public.  I know it's expensive,
but the performance capability these components offer is worth every penny.
Quote
Just out of curiosity how much weight savings was there in replacing everything with TI hardware.
   
Close to ten pounds with the biggest savings coming from the shock spring, linkage and axles.
Quote
What kind of frame gusseting did you have done and was it a noticable difference?
Basically we added some stiffeners around the steering stem and ran beads all the way around
areas that were only spot welded at the factory.  The goal was to increase reliabilty and delay
"frame spread".
Quote
How often did you have to freshen that engine?
When I was racing every weekend (back when I was "serious") I would replace the top end weekly.
The clutch pack after every moto/practice, and the bottom end would get checked every four races
mostly because I had more money than sense.  Most of these slightly used parts would end up in my
practice bikes throughout the season.  Back in the day, I had two complete race motors and two
complete suspension sets.  One would be at the shop for rebuild/refresh while the other was being
raced each week.  Truth be told, I believe an A/pro level rider could could get by with a top end
replacement every four races and use the same bottom end for the whole season with complete
reliability.  A B/intermediate racer could double that.  Try doing that on a four stroke - BOOOOM!
 
Looking back, the baddest CRs I ever raced were my '00 and '01.  I nicknamed my '00 "Christine" after
a couple of "soil samples", that bike demanded respect or else.  TMR built me the motor of doom and
after a lot of testing, I managed to get the frame and suspension dialed in.  The '02 and later CRs were
definitely a step back in performance power wise.  In my opinion, The HPP valve engine was light years
better than the case reed, and I believe that design stumble hastened the defections to the four
strokes, at least among Honda riders. 

dogger 


Pages: 1 ... 10 11 [12] 13 14