Coming Soon
Home > Forum


Author Topic: Shorty Silencer vs Regular Length  (Read 8312 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MyckMcClung

  • Professional
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
    • View Profile
Re: Shorty Silencer vs Regular Length
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2011, 06:08:29 AM »
Yes DirtAddict, what you have been told before coming here is all BS.
If a pair of 2" brass balls isn't working, I doubt that the 3" model will make much difference.

Offline chump6784

  • Expert
  • ****
  • Posts: 120
    • View Profile
Re: Shorty Silencer vs Regular Length
« Reply #16 on: March 19, 2011, 05:16:32 PM »
One question, do shortys actually give more bottom/mid and reduce top end or do they just allow the bike the rev out quicker making it FEEL like it changes the power? I have always thought it enabled the bike to rev out quicker resulting in the different feeling power curve

Offline MyckMcClung

  • Professional
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
    • View Profile
Re: Shorty Silencer vs Regular Length
« Reply #17 on: March 19, 2011, 08:20:16 PM »
Well I'll tell you this, the RM85 I bought for my daughter came with a FMF SST pipe and Shorty silencer, the ignition was also advanced to the max. The SST is a topend pipe the Shortly is a bottom end silencer, from open to 1/2 throttle the bike had nothing, then it would just scream with power to about 3/4 throttle and had nothing else. The jetting was also very rich, FMF recommends 48 pilot 125 main stock needle at second clip, this thing has 50 p, 128 m. I moved the clip up to the 4th groove,  installed  a Moose torque spacer between the Vforce 3 and intake tract set the air screw 2 turns out. Now the bike is like a tractor, until half throttle then it friggin rips, up to just about 3/4 throttle and falls flat.
I wish I had the stock silencer or a Powercore to test against the Shorty.
If a pair of 2" brass balls isn't working, I doubt that the 3" model will make much difference.

Offline George

  • Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 52
    • View Profile
Re: Shorty Silencer vs Regular Length
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2011, 06:53:42 AM »
in my experience, a shorter silencer makes for a sharper, narrower power band. I had a standard pipe on my old kx85 (going back a few years) and 3 silencers, all standard, one normal length, one cut 2 inch shorter and one about 3.5 inches shorter, the shorter ones were better on hard pack/ tacky grippy ground, the longest was best in deep sand/ mud, hope this helps

i wrote this a few days ago, and with standard front pipe a shorter silencer let the engine pick up sooner and go better in the right conditions, if your really serious about racing then its an idea to stock up on a few different lengths, but on my rm250 im not bothering changing lengths because with bigger bikes there is less emphasis on peak power as useable power gives better laps, so i have a full length silencer ont the 250