Does anyone know if the Boyesen system is any different to Honda's AR system? I've checked, as much as I can, and can't find much on the Boyesen to separate it from Honda's Trapping valve set up they used on the EXP400 and the CRM250ARs that where sold, I think as late as 2000/01/02?
Yes, Honda used a partial 'diesel' system, with a combination of spark ignition & diesel/compression ignition ( I can't recall the order,low revs/ high revs, but understand that this can be applied either way), and I've seen no mention of this being used in the Boyesen engine, and, of course, the external nature of the trapping valve drive system is a result of it being an add on to an existing engine.
Is it fundamentally different to the Honda AR system?(of course it is, if its not using AR combustion - I'm really referring to the Trapping Valve concept) Have the Honda patents expired, and Boyesen have just taken up an engineering solution that has been left languishing?. Something tells me Eyvind Boyesen would perhaps be doing more than just refining the Trapping Valve, but I guess that's basically what he did with the reed valve, and the royalties paid by the factories that used the dual stage reeds certainly were well deserved - maybe, he's doing the same thing again, improving on the Trapping Valve and patenting those improvements?
When you see the variety of options available to the furthering of 2t development, be it DFI, EFI, AR, Trapping Valves, AST, FAST and the various combinations of these technologies ( and others ), it makes you wonder why these solutions haven't swept 4ts aside. It's sad & infuriating.