I can imagine that would be a big help. I once spent five minutes on a 440 Maico and that damn thing required a hand of forged titanium in order to use the clutch (although who in the hell uses the clutch on a 440 Maico, anyway?) However, I have never encountered a brake, front or back, that really required much force to pull in whatsoever. It's just been a non-issue, and the effectiveness of the brake hasn't seemed to have any effect on this. So that's why it seems peculiar to me that so few bikes have hydraulic clutches, and so many have hydraulic brake calipers. I would be curious to see a comparison on just how much force is required to disengage a clutch, versus how much force is required to clamp on the brake disks. Especially on the rear brake, I mean, the amount of power you can put down on a brake lever like that is practically endless. That's what makes me think that maybe there's something inherent to disk brakes that requires they be set up with fluids and hydraulics, rather than rods, cables and levers. Don't read too much into this, I'm not implying that one is better than the other, I'm just wondering why it be. If nothing else, it's got to cost a bit more, right?