FI has made it easier for you to just get in your car and go, but it hasn't yielded much power increases. It helps reliability for the people that can't listen to an engine thats not starting and realize they may need to pull the choke out or pump the gas pedal. If there were substantial increases, all performance cars would run FI. In drag racing, the really fast cars run FI (top fuel, top alcohol, ect.) because they pump so much fuel/air into the engines, carburetors would limit the airflow and not allow the fuel delivery. Just to show how much fuel they pump into the 500 ci engines in top fuel, when the engines 'blow' a gasket and make that big fireball, it is because the engine hydro-locked from having so much fuel in the cylinders and blew out the 1/4 inch solid copper head gasket. I think they use about 16 gallons per 1000 ft. Carbs can't deliver that much fuel, but they can keep up with FI on engines with less demands. FI was not introduced for performance, it was introduced for many other reasons like to get people to go to the dealer to work on their cars, so your car can start easier in 20 degree weather, so there can be more electronics that costed less than mechanical equivalents because they were made overseas, ect. My 1974 Plymouth Duster does just as well as any other car, I just have to listen to it in different conditions and know how to adjust the carb on the performance engine in it. If the engine was stock, all I'd need was a choke and it'd be just as good as any other stock 360 ci engine with FI. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy to drive my FI Suburban around because of it's convenience. But it has 275 hp when the 454 Chevelle had 450 hp in the '70s with the 800 cfm carbureted LS6 454.