Messages

61

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: Poll of some sorts. Answer honesty please.

« on: August 15, 2011, 07:44:16 PM »

Ooo...I want a secret message to! Can I get one?

Im thinking this thread didnt go quite like you had expected. lol

Went exactly like I wanted. Thanks.

62

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 15, 2011, 06:53:27 PM »

And that fact that I raced at a higher level and have rode both.

I think your stretching it a little bit there.    How many classes did you race at Lorettas this year? Ive been following motocross religiously for 15 years and have never heard of Meidosoracing.

Bigair40 still rides at that level @ 45 years old so why attack him like he doesnt know what he's talking about?

Like I've stated, I'm only talking about facts.  I have never raced LL, ONLY because I never had money and did racing all on my own. My parents didn't help me for sheet.  I am not going after him at all. I'm just trying to point some things out, using facts. And you don't like it.  My Fact about racing at a higher level, again is a fact of holding a ProAMA license.  I never said I was faster than him, I'm quite sure he will smoke me now since I only get to ride maybe 3-4 times per year. I just said I raced at a higher level. Quite the contrary, kudos for him answering my questions.  

63

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: Poll of some sorts. Answer honesty please.

« on: August 15, 2011, 05:42:40 PM »

Like I stated in the beginning. I have a reason. Some here should keep an eye on their message box. 

64

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 15, 2011, 05:23:57 PM »

TotalNZ +2

TotalNZ +1

Just curious how you guys feel TotalNZ plus anything, when I've shown that the guys he is referring too were comparing a 1997 or earlier KTM 360 to a 2006+ KX450F? And that fact that I raced at a higher level and have rode both.  Please enlighten me.

65

General Two Stroke Talk / Proof of what we say, if all manufacturers made 2 strokes.

« on: August 15, 2011, 04:02:56 PM »

LL 250B stock class.  Here's what you should observe.  How many 4 stroke KTM and Yamaha bikes are out there. Plus the fact that as we've stated, the fastest guys are on 4 strokes, I'd be willing to bet, sponsored heavily seeing what names they have.  
Loretta Lynn's 2011 250B Stock Uncut ft Bell / Martin / Hill  

66

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 15, 2011, 01:06:48 PM »

Borrowed bike because i didnt have a 450, the one i bought broke a rod so i parted it out(kaw) ,had a 250f didnt feel like it was fast enough since the 360 was faster ! and didnt have good luck on it,also people would slam me about that bike every time i raced it last yr untill i let them ride it and then they would say its still ugly . lol... and for people to say that thumpers are junk is nuts !!!!never practiced on the KXf450 and  just rode the regional qualifier the area Q i raced my 250f

The one you parted out, broke a rod on you? How did it go?  What happened? The 450F you owned (practiced and usetoo) before qualifying, was the same bike (kawi 450F) as you borrowed? The 360 was faster than the 250F and you raced the 250F? I don't get it. I get the ugly part, I also get the old part.  So do you agree, things may have been different had it been on a newer KTM, in both looks and how good they are?  My points, are directly related to the fact that it wasn't the 2 stroke per say, but the part that you felt dumb because everyone made fun of you, like an ugly kid in school, and the fact that it was an old and outdated bike.  I'm just trying to get to the facts, not cloud it with judgement.  That bike 360 was the dated version 380 in 1998, inwhich lost a shootout to a YZ400F. I'm pretty sure no one would compare a 1998 YZ400F to a 2006+ KX450F. Right?  I think some of you guys are confused (ie: TotalNZ).  But I raced pro, and have rode both 2 and 4.  So saying I don't have facts are out of line.  I'm getting down to facts on this post as we speak.  It seems opinions may have been alittle clouded on some facts on this subject. JMHO.

By the way, the 4 strokes came into play back in what 98?  They didn't dominate anywhere until maybe 2004'ish?  It will take some time at cc vs cc.  Just sayin

67

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: "I will win on my KTM"

« on: August 14, 2011, 02:26:37 AM »

If only KTM was yesterday what they are today, it wouldn't even be in question. Unfortunately, those bikes weren't todays KTM's. Mcgrath in his prime on a 2012/2003 KTM 250SX would have had their first SX championship.  Unfortunately, years later, now they finally have things together, and we will see if Dungey can pull it off.

68

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 14, 2011, 02:14:54 AM »

ive raced LL 14 times one B class and the rest A class on a dr4,rm2,rm2,ktm2,ktm2,ktm2,yam2,yam4,yam4,ktm4,ktm4,ktm,ktm4,ktm4   2 or 4 =stroke (for you slow people) soooo i know how to switch gears ,iam not stuck in the past,the 360 was my all time favorite bike which is why i tryed on it last yr.  i have never had a thumper take a DUMP on me! but have had two strokes do it. cranks and piston locating pins !! I ONLY RACED 4 times and practiced 3 time before LL and 2 of them wher quailifiers ,and borrowed a bike after i was at the regional(kx450f) never rode it before ,won the +40 and got 7th in the +35 at RED BUD look it up!!! i found this site when i had my 360 thought it was cool but starting to think some of you are  actually some ones wifes   

Right there is exactly why you got slammed, so please don't say it is us.  You were directly comparing the fact that you couldn't qualify on a 1990's 360 compared to a newer 450F. We called you on it, and now you are not understanding the cold shoulder. If you would have rode a 2011 KTM 300XC, and then said, hey I was down on power or something, we would have said, hey that's cool.  But to say anything 1990's compares to todays bikes is just, well you see the flow of the slams.  You also have changed your tune about how many times you rode which bike.  Why did you have to borrow a bike?  What was your normal bike that you rode?  Things like that, instead of saying, I didn't qualify because I rode a 2 stroke...

69

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 13, 2011, 12:57:47 PM »

By the way, when stewart got on his 450F, what happened?  Still got his azz handed to him by Ricky.  The 450F didn't make a bit of difference, stewart was still running second.  There are some serious shills here. The key way to always know, is the first part always says, "I love 2 strokes." Just sayin. Change the MO.

70

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 13, 2011, 12:54:48 PM »

I love 2 strokes at LL I was behind the womens class and there was a girl from cali #22 on a yz 125 that was the baddest sounding thing ther!! i think her sister won the class ? (same last name) buttt last year i tried on a ktm 360 that was fresh and a real nice bike !!!!!! fast handled good, it just was not good enough to do the job i invested a lot of money in that experiment and it didnt work out the way i hoped (dnq for LL ) this yr i borrowed a kawajunki 450 which i am not a fan of and made it to LL only rode 4 time befor that !! so if you remember stewart saying wait till i get my 450 he would beat RC and windham on the crf making ricky earn it!!! all yr long when RC rode a RM,i think that would be proof enough 

Riding a 1990's 360 that was less than praised as a good bike to a pack of new bikes is kinda a bad example, no matter how good it handled etc. As I've stated, the new bikes are better by far, both 2 and 4 strokes. JMHO.  I'd like to see how a 2012 KTM 300XC would have done for you.  Anyways, what do you mean you qualified by only riding a KX450F 4 times?  I'm not getting that. So you never practiced on the KX and you just rode the qualifiers? Or did you qualify on another bike and then raced the KX450F?

71

Photos & Videos / Re: 2012 Husaberg Models intro video

« on: August 11, 2011, 08:31:47 PM »

Cool video, but they had to end it with Farting. LOL

72

General Two Stroke Talk / Poll of some sorts. Answer honesty please.

« on: August 11, 2011, 12:06:22 AM »

Do you only like 2 strokes, or do you like both 2 and 4 strokes? No reasoning please, just answer. Thanks

73

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: bringing out the 2 stroke

« on: August 10, 2011, 04:36:04 PM »

Good luck. 144cc kit does wonders. :-)

74

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 09, 2011, 06:05:24 AM »

Chill out miedosoracing. You seem to like argueing with people. ( I visit Vital now and then )

What snook said and was repeated by Vintage. : UNDER THE CURRANT RULES A 4 STROKE IS BETTER. Under the Pro rules.

I dont think that is a inflammatory statement, Just a sad truth.

Every time this sort of discussion comes up people missunderstand which set of rules are being talked about.

Now hugs & kisses everyone.

yeah, I love to argue on the forums.    But hey, i only do it, because people keep saying the same thing, and that ticks me off. They continuely say how good the 4 strokes are. I don't get it.  They are not better in any way shape form or fashion.  They are not "that good."  They are just given a handicap. Plain and simple.  Give me a double stroke handicap and I'll kick Tigers ass.  Does that make me better at golf than Tiger?  Just because the rules give me that handicap? So there 

75

General Two Stroke Talk / Re: 4 $troke lovers= delusional people

« on: August 08, 2011, 11:56:01 PM »

My point? That people like you say that 4 strokes are just so good. Second, that you said in one breath a 450 wouldn't make me as a Pro any faster, but then claim a 250 2 stroke held back the guys qualifying this year. But is it really about the 4 stroke, or is it truely about the cc's?  Because I get the vibe as others here, that to you, it's about the 4 stroke being that good, via your "Modern" 4 strokes are just to good now" type statements over and over.  It's not about that, it's clearly about the cc's.  So is it really about how good the modern 4 strokes are?  I personally don't care about the pro side of things. The amateur side is moving back to 2 strokes pretty fast.  AMA districts are much much more fluid with 2 strokes than the last 4 years or so.  The practice tracks have many more here in the Texas area as well.  I don't race anymore, so can't tell you about those races locally. I do know the rules are now fair though here.