Lol,nice spy photo Coop.
As for me,I don't hate them,I just see them as they are-many others don't.The 490 was an impressive,innovative bike in many ways but unimpressive in many others.Most of the cheerleaders won't actually tell you about the problems but only go on at length about how they're even better than modern machinery.I'm amazed you don't see them cleaning up at the local level at least.
" title="Roll Eyes" class="smiley">
If you read the entire MXA article you'll get the idea.For those of you who weren't around then,this is a good article....
http://books.google.ca/books?id=uAzl8ICKMXcC&pg=PA123&lpg=PA123&dq=maico+breako&source=bl&ots=3mh-iIATBU&sig=xWmFzlmjoVAw3B4O34qgWVszEys&hl=en&sa=X&ei=L5cMUKJ1ge_SAYXWpI0E&ved=0CFMQ6AEwBgJust hit the +magnifying glass on the upper left or it's a tough read-for old failing eyes anyway.
For modern day,I'm not impressed with someone who promises the moon and delivers sh!t.Early on I got ripped for saying that the new Maico reminded me of Cannondale.Hmmmm.
In truth,the Maico name means diddly.If you have the means to market a good bike-do it.It would be neat to resurrect an old name but everyone realizes that it's not really the same thing-any more than an old and new Triumph is the same.
People who would be interested in buying a new Maico for nostalgic reasons because they remembered them from their youth would generally be 50 + yrs old now-hardly the largest dirt bike riding segment of the population.If that demographic is their target,they'd be gone in short order anyway.The majority of youth wouldn't even recognize the name.
I'm getting older myself and fully understand the concept of looking back fondly with dark tinted rose coloured glasses,but there's point where it just gets ridiculous-and the "best bike that has ever been built" would definitely fall in that category-for me anyway.