That's a perfect templete to follow, if a CLC is pro-active with the council and work to resolve issues, soon the council will refer any complaints to the CLC as they have a process to resolve issues. Councils like that because it means no work for them. Complaints outside that process won't even get looked at. Also it gives the club a greater time to stop issues escalating out of their control. Just use lots of buzz words like 'complience measures' 'sound abatement stratergies' 'audited by accedited testers' 'community consultation' .
The club will also have to look at things they can and can't control. Such as you cannot stop housing development unless they by up the land around the track, it's wasteful and counter productive to rail agsinst anyone who bought a cheap house, near the race track. You can modify behaviours , and stop noise and dust.
The situation is a bit like live music venues, lots of times the the complaints against live music venues were not about the music in the venue but more about groups of people leaving the events late at night usualy drunk, then the surrounding residents get fights, bottles smashed, people pissing in their yards, vandalisim etc etc. If that was a regular occurance in your street would you be happy? What would you say to someone who said "Well you should have known when you bought a house near the venue".