Two Stroke Motocross Forum => General Two Stroke Talk => Topic started by: monsteryz125 on April 30, 2012, 03:35:10 AM
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: monsteryz125 on April 30, 2012, 03:35:10 AM
Hey guys, seems like ages since ive posted anything but i need help, have a chance to pick up a 93 kx 250 for basically free with some extra parts, my question for you guys is, whats the power like? Good idea bad idea? And lastly any particular quirks with this year? I know nothing about kawasakis, thanks
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: ruskee on April 30, 2012, 04:51:23 AM
The only quirk is its a kawasaki
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: cnrcpla on April 30, 2012, 12:14:26 PM
I don't know much about kawi's, but its a 250 2T, it has to have some power to it
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on April 30, 2012, 01:06:28 PM
the 93 was a good year from my knowledge . the only known areas of concern would be the tranny . I had a 91 kx250 back in the day and it was fast , had good usable power but it liked killing 4th gear for some reason . If its free I'd snag it up quik.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Shawn36 on April 30, 2012, 01:14:18 PM
I had a '94 KX125 that fell apart more than I could believe. At no point before or since have I had a bike that went through at least one foot peg spring every ride. It's like Kawi designed the thing to fall apart every other race. I hope the 250s were better quality.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on April 30, 2012, 01:32:36 PM
Kawi didn't make a good 250 until 97. If you are going to ride trails or in your back yard, go for it. But if you are going to do anything remotely serious on it, skip it and go spend a grand on a mid 00s YZ that needs a top end or something.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Marco810 on April 30, 2012, 02:18:02 PM
Its a good wood bike, lots of power down low, not much to speak of up top
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: SachsGS on April 30, 2012, 03:13:12 PM
Be prepared to replace/repair a lot of parts.Those old Kaws weren't the best built machines.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on April 30, 2012, 04:18:22 PM
there is a gray area in the late 80s early 90s where it isn't old enough for vintage class racing, but it isn't new enough to be worth a shit. i think super vintage is conventional forks and drum rears.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on April 30, 2012, 05:13:36 PM
there is a gray area in the late 80s early 90s where it isn't old enough for vintage class racing, but it isn't new enough to be worth a shit. i think super vintage is conventional forks and drum rears.
Just because a bike isnt up to date dosent mean it isnt worth a shit . My 88 kx250 was one of the most reliable bikes I ever rode and had no problem running with 00+ machines in the woods or at hard rock . Its all in rider ability as to what you can do with an older bike . They may be a little harder to ride consistantly than modern bikes but if you want the easy way out buy a 4stroke
Keeping the older bikes alive seems pretty important to me as far as keeping 2 strokes alive in general .
This bike cost me almost nothing other than fresh tires and air filter,a few adjustments and she was a beast . I had a guy out at tanglewood try to take off and leave me down a 2 mile long whoop trail on a yzf426 and I stayed right next to him the entire way . This bike cleared the water tower jump at hardrock more than a couple times also . I still miss it wish I would kept it as a 2nd bike
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Marco810 on May 01, 2012, 12:14:31 AM
there is a gray area in the late 80s early 90s where it isn't old enough for vintage class racing, but it isn't new enough to be worth a shit. i think super vintage is conventional forks and drum rears.
Just because a bike isnt up to date dosent mean it isnt worth a shit . My 88 kx250 was one of the most reliable bikes I ever rode and had no problem running with 00+ machines in the woods or at hard rock . Its all in rider ability as to what you can do with an older bike . They may be a little harder to ride consistantly than modern bikes but if you want the easy way out buy a 4stroke
Keeping the older bikes alive seems pretty important to me as far as keeping 2 strokes alive in general .
This bike cost me almost nothing other than fresh tires and air filter,a few adjustments and she was a beast . I had a guy out at tanglewood try to take off and leave me down a 2 mile long whoop trail on a yzf426 and I stayed right next to him the entire way . This bike cleared the water tower jump at hardrock more than a couple times also . I still miss it wish I would kept it as a 2nd bike
Nice bike, I like that year. looks like a 500 minus the big jug, infact i think they share body parts. I'm a kawi man myself, seems people around here like the orange ones..
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 12:31:16 AM
there is a gray area in the late 80s early 90s where it isn't old enough for vintage class racing, but it isn't new enough to be worth a shit. i think super vintage is conventional forks and drum rears.
Just because a bike isnt up to date dosent mean it isnt worth a shit . My 88 kx250 was one of the most reliable bikes I ever rode and had no problem running with 00+ machines in the woods or at hard rock . Its all in rider ability as to what you can do with an older bike . They may be a little harder to ride consistantly than modern bikes but if you want the easy way out buy a 4stroke
Keeping the older bikes alive seems pretty important to me as far as keeping 2 strokes alive in general .
This bike cost me almost nothing other than fresh tires and air filter,a few adjustments and she was a beast . I had a guy out at tanglewood try to take off and leave me down a 2 mile long whoop trail on a yzf426 and I stayed right next to him the entire way . This bike cleared the water tower jump at hardrock more than a couple times also . I still miss it wish I would kept it as a 2nd bike
and like i said, if you are going to trail ride it, then it's a good bike.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: cnrcpla on May 01, 2012, 02:02:18 AM
Quote
Just because a bike isnt up to date dosent mean it isnt worth a shit . My 88 kx250 was one of the most reliable bikes I ever rode and had no problem running with 00+ machines in the woods or at hard rock . Its all in rider ability as to what you can do with an older bike . They may be a little harder to ride consistantly than modern bikes but if you want the easy way out buy a 4stroke Evil
Keeping the older bikes alive seems pretty important to me as far as keeping 2 strokes alive in general .
This bike cost me almost nothing other than fresh tires and air filter,a few adjustments and she was a beast . I had a guy out at tanglewood try to take off and leave me down a 2 mile long whoop trail on a yzf426 and I stayed right next to him the entire way . This bike cleared the water tower jump at hardrock more than a couple times also . I still miss it wish I would kept it as a 2nd bike
Nice bike. I completely agree, I think people over look bikes that aren't recent. They still pull with the modern bikes and have that old school tank-like structure. Like an old phone, reliable, but it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of the latest and greatest. And to some people that's just fine. Not to mention, give it ten years and even the 2012 yz250's will be "out dated"
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: TMKIWI on May 01, 2012, 05:45:51 AM
Not to mention, give it ten years and even the 2012 yz250's will be "out dated"
What do you mean " give it 10 years".
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: VintageBlueSmoke on May 01, 2012, 09:56:21 AM
The '93 KX250 was a very potent woods weapon. SE&TRA was dominated by them if I remember correctly. I seem to remember a "sea of Green" at every race and only rarely was another brand even on the podium. I was often very alone on my Husky.
Had my dealer not sold the business that year, I probably would have bought one (well, the 125 anyway).
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: factoryX on May 01, 2012, 10:32:06 AM
Older bikes are a blast to ride. They really aren't that out dated, one of limiting factors being suspension. I would personally love to have this over my yz.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: cnrcpla on May 01, 2012, 12:10:08 PM
Quote
What do you mean " give it 10 years". Tongue
What, it wouldn't take that long? Not to mention, we all know according to the Mayans that 2012 will be the last year to make bikes anyways
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: factoryX on May 01, 2012, 12:54:01 PM
Ha, he's pointing out that the bike is already outdated.. The only difference with 2002 model and 2012 is the aluminum frame and better suspension. If I buy an 2012 yz250 frame, everything off my 03 yz250 will literally bolt on, even the sub frame despite different part numbers.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 01, 2012, 01:13:24 PM
there is a gray area in the late 80s early 90s where it isn't old enough for vintage class racing, but it isn't new enough to be worth a shit. i think super vintage is conventional forks and drum rears.
Just because a bike isnt up to date dosent mean it isnt worth a shit . My 88 kx250 was one of the most reliable bikes I ever rode and had no problem running with 00+ machines in the woods or at hard rock . Its all in rider ability as to what you can do with an older bike . They may be a little harder to ride consistantly than modern bikes but if you want the easy way out buy a 4stroke
Keeping the older bikes alive seems pretty important to me as far as keeping 2 strokes alive in general .
This bike cost me almost nothing other than fresh tires and air filter,a few adjustments and she was a beast . I had a guy out at tanglewood try to take off and leave me down a 2 mile long whoop trail on a yzf426 and I stayed right next to him the entire way . This bike cleared the water tower jump at hardrock more than a couple times also . I still miss it wish I would kept it as a 2nd bike
and like i said, if you are going to trail ride it, then it's a good bike.
It did just as good on the track as any trail . you said you knew hardrock pretty well and this bike shredded hard rock and had no problem clearing any of the jumps . Seems like there might be a grey area between not worth a shit and good trail bike. just sayin .
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 02:01:59 PM
Boils down to personal opinion then really. No doubt you can huck the water tower, at least on the left side on an 89, but isn't it more fun on an 09? To me it is. To each his own, I like the ergonomics and stiffer frames, lighter weight of the newer bikes. the build quality and finish has only improved with time. Remember the bars these bikes came with? Remember the oem plastics and graphics? I remember nightmares of brand new early 90s bikes looking completely hammered after 2 rides. These days, you just put numbers on them. You have pro tapers and all the goodies, especially the KTMs.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: cnrcpla on May 01, 2012, 03:41:29 PM
Quote
Ha, he's pointing out that the bike is already outdated.. The only difference with 2002 model and 2012 is the aluminum frame and better suspension. If I buy an 2012 yz250 frame, everything off my 03 yz250 will literally bolt on, even the sub frame despite different part numbers.
Good point. I wish the factories would put some more effort in 2T's... I'm sure someone has some ideas that can make the displacement rule somewhat fair as far as power vs. power, instead of rigged BS like it is now.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 04:30:10 PM
Ha, he's pointing out that the bike is already outdated.. The only difference with 2002 model and 2012 is the aluminum frame and better suspension. If I buy an 2012 yz250 frame, everything off my 03 yz250 will literally bolt on, even the sub frame despite different part numbers.
Ask Charles how bolting parts from an 05 to an 11 worked for them at midnight in the pits at VMP.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 01, 2012, 05:04:45 PM
Boils down to personal opinion then really. No doubt you can huck the water tower, at least on the left side on an 89, but isn't it more fun on an 09? To me it is. To each his own, I like the ergonomics and stiffer frames, lighter weight of the newer bikes. the build quality and finish has only improved with time. Remember the bars these bikes came with? Remember the oem plastics and graphics? I remember nightmares of brand new early 90s bikes looking completely hammered after 2 rides. These days, you just put numbers on them. You have pro tapers and all the goodies, especially the KTMs.
I agree 100%. The bikes have without a doubt improved over the years . I love bikes in general and working a little harder to smoke newer bikes on an old 88 model is what I loved the most . Proving that its rider ability and not having the best bike money can buy in order to go fast . my main concern is keeping 2 strokes alive and all the bikes that make their legacy what it is today . Without the mxer's of the past we wouldnt have the new bikes we have out today . Honestly dont feel a huge difference in handling going from my 91 cr125 to my 03 rm125 . Both bikes are flickable and fast .
I've never cleared the water tower from the left side on any bike including the 88 , right side launching into blue sky for me .
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 06:00:11 PM
this guy just about gets all the way over the 3rd hump on a 125 @ :45
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 01, 2012, 06:13:58 PM
this guy just about gets all the way over the 3rd hump on a 125 @ :45
That guy is letting off the gas way to much , the 2nd lap around looked like he cleared a little bit better . Last time I was there a kid was killing that jump on an 85 . was pretty impresive to say the least. I'm not gonna lie the shadiest part of launching that 88 off that jump was slowing down for the turn on the other side . Dam man I feel like loading the bike up and going to Ocala now .
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 06:20:36 PM
5 lap dash, last place pays the bill at the Cracker Barrel at the Lakeland exit off I-4.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 01, 2012, 06:27:01 PM
5 lap dash, last place pays the bill at the Cracker Barrel at the Lakeland exit off I-4.
lol 5 is about all I'm good for . If you change cracker barrel to olive garden in ocala i'm down . I'm planning a trip to go to High point in Ga with a couple of bud's that want to buy some orange bikes within the next month or so . When are you coming to FL?
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: factoryX on May 01, 2012, 06:28:41 PM
Ha, he's pointing out that the bike is already outdated.. The only difference with 2002 model and 2012 is the aluminum frame and better suspension. If I buy an 2012 yz250 frame, everything off my 03 yz250 will literally bolt on, even the sub frame despite different part numbers.
Ask Charles how bolting parts from an 05 to an 11 worked for them at midnight in the pits at VMP.
Just checked parts numbers on frames, 2011+ have a different part number, 2010-05 are exactly the same. Odd.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 06:30:50 PM
5 lap dash, last place pays the bill at the Cracker Barrel at the Lakeland exit off I-4.
lol 5 is about all I'm good for . If you change cracker barrel to olive garden in ocala i'm down . I'm planning a trip to go to High point in Ga with a couple of bud's that want to buy some orange bikes within the next month or so . When are you coming to FL?
june 4-8 to orlando, but im flying, so I wont have my bike. i will get down there with my bike this year though, for sure.
hey, memorial day weekend, there is a big event at south of the border MX, which is jimmy weinerts new facility. i am going, and im trying to talk Charles into it. Why don't you come up for that? i made that drive 2 months ago, its not that bad from Tampa, and youre in Brookesville, so thats almost an hour closer.
saturday practice, bonfire at night, sunday racing. jimmy weinert.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 01, 2012, 06:35:27 PM
That sounds like a sweet idea where is it located ? I'm actually in crystal river so I'm north of brooksville a little bit
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 01, 2012, 06:38:02 PM
Okay then, just talked to Charles and he said the only problem was the 2011 front wheel wouldn't bolt up with the 05 forks/triples.
i think the parts differences in the YZ250s are largely dependent on the 250Fs. I think they wan to machine one part, rather than two different parts, wherever they can. so, somewhere between 05 and 11, the 250F probably got a new front wheel or hub spacers. something.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: factoryX on May 01, 2012, 07:00:39 PM
Probably, just thought it was weird, especially when the 2011 up frames are cheaper on bikebandit.
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 06, 2012, 01:46:52 PM
Did you get the bike?
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: scotty dog on May 06, 2012, 11:23:23 PM
Yea what happened to the dude askin bout the 93 KX? I owned one from new in 94, was a pretty good bike for a KX, it broke the powervalve off but thats it from what i remember, if its free get it, free shit is good!!
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: MetalMike1982 on May 07, 2012, 02:05:20 PM
Yea what happened to the dude askin bout the 93 KX? I owned one from new in 94, was a pretty good bike for a KX, it broke the powervalve off but thats it from what i remember, if its free get it, free shit is good!!
Good bike? Are you kidding me these things will break footpeg springs just from stareing to hard at them . The frames bend and crack after the 2nd ride . You didnt know? lol . I'm joking Kawi's are good bikes , I loved the ones I had and never had any problems with any of them . i might go pick up a 98 kx250 for $250 from this guy I know . Basket case deal
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: scotty dog on May 07, 2012, 11:07:29 PM
Yea what happened to the dude askin bout the 93 KX? I owned one from new in 94, was a pretty good bike for a KX, it broke the powervalve off but thats it from what i remember, if its free get it, free shit is good!!
Good bike? Are you kidding me these things will break footpeg springs just from stareing to hard at them . The frames bend and crack after the 2nd ride . You didnt know? lol . I'm joking Kawi's are good bikes , I loved the ones I had and never had any problems with any of them . i might go pick up a 98 kx250 for $250 from this guy I know . Basket case deal
Notice i wrote "for a KX" in there.. Its too far back for me to remember too much detail
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: monsteryz125 on May 08, 2012, 12:43:29 AM
Sorry guys been really busy between school and work, thanks for the replys ive been checking back in randomly, the reason i asked is a guy wanted to trade me one for my old 150f that i havent touched in 2 years, but i ended up getting another trade offer, 87 monte ss with t tops and a built small block chevy, thatll match my 80 trans am nicely
Title: 93 kx 250?
Post by: Premixed on May 08, 2012, 04:15:44 PM
from a 93 KX250 to an 87 monte carlo? You went from Chicken Metasevich to Dale Earnhardt.