Two Stroke Motocross
Two Stroke Motocross Forum => General Two Stroke Talk => Topic started by: metal_miracle on April 23, 2012, 06:26:16 PM
-
2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996
1995

1994

1993

1992

1991

1990

1989

1988

1987

1986

1985

1984

1983

1982

1981

1980

1979

1975

1973

-
Maybe missing a few?
1974:
-
no... I got most of them but i was just a reply and to not clutter up show your bike thread..
but if it would interest anyone i can put up the rest
-
but if it would interest anyone i can put up the rest
Go on then.
-
pot this up so cnrcpla can figure out what year his bike is?
-
I already did that.
http://twostrokemotocross.com/forum/index.php/topic,3632.60.html
-
Insert Quote
pot this up so cnrcpla can figure out what year his bike is?
Factoryx and I already had that figured out a while ago. Still wish I could have found that serial number though
93' is what we decided I believe, I might have put 94' a few times because that's what I got used to ordering parts for a while back hahaha, but 93' is what seems plausible. The only distinguishing factor is the shape of the stator cover and swing arm, or at least those stood out to me.
-
plz remove the none stock pictures.
i will get the studio photos up soon
-
Insert Quote
pot this up so cnrcpla can figure out what year his bike is?
Factoryx and I already had that figured out a while ago. Still wish I could have found that serial number though
93' is what we decided I believe, I might have put 94' a few times because that's what I got used to ordering parts for a while back hahaha, but 93' is what seems plausible. The only distinguishing factor is the shape of the stator cover and swing arm, or at least those stood out to me.
also look at how the rad shrouds are attached to the tank/rad you can tell the difference between 92 and 93 both in the bolt location and the number of bolts . 93 is showing 3 bolts for the shroud and the 92 is showing 4 and not spaced out nearly as much as the 93 . I've said it before and I'll say it again your bike is a 92 IMHO . Unless someone before you put a 92 tank on a 93 -95 bike.
-
Another key area of difference is the number plates and rear shock linkage .
-
also look at how the rad shrouds are attached to the tank/rad you can tell the difference between 92 and 93 both in the bolt location and the number of bolts . 93 is showing 3 bolts for the shroud and the 92 is showing 4 and not spaced out nearly as much as the 93 . I've said it before and I'll say it again your bike is a 92 IMHO . Unless someone before you put a 92 tank on a 93 -95 bike.
Yeah, you are probably right, I just noticed that. But I don't really think a few years or so matter, I have been ordering parts for a 94' and I haven't had any snags yet
Not to mention, my bike still keeps up with every single modern bike I have ever ridden/raced with. I have just done so many mods to it I guess. Other than that suspension is basically new, as with the tires and frame, so years don't bother me much hahaha
But enough thread robbing, lets get back to the main topic
-
also look at how the rad shrouds are attached to the tank/rad you can tell the difference between 92 and 93 both in the bolt location and the number of bolts . 93 is showing 3 bolts for the shroud and the 92 is showing 4 and not spaced out nearly as much as the 93 . I've said it before and I'll say it again your bike is a 92 IMHO . Unless someone before you put a 92 tank on a 93 -95 bike.
Yeah, you are probably right, I just noticed that. But I don't really think a few years or so matter, I have been ordering parts for a 94' and I haven't had any snags yet
Not to mention, my bike still keeps up with every single modern bike I have ever ridden/raced with. I have just done so many mods to it I guess. Other than that suspension is basically new, as with the tires and frame, so years don't bother me much hahaha
But enough thread robbing, lets get back to the main topic
I wouldnt let it being a 92 matter one bit . It's modern enough to compete with any newer mx'r . I wasnt saying that to make you feel like you have an old bike . I was just stateing that so you could have a definite year .
-
I wouldnt let it being a 92 matter one bit . It's modern enough to compete with any newer mx'r . I wasnt saying that to make you feel like you have an old bike . I was just stateing that so you could have a definite year .
No I know, I understand. I said it once before in some other thread, but I don't get why people make such a big deal over years. If you get the engine done every season or so, its like a whole new engine. Especially with Yamaha, the design hasn't changed much from the 90's, I mean the frame is different, but the engine hasn't changed a whole lot except for the power valve, so it doesn't bother me one bit hahaha
-
I want some race footage of the 199? YZ
-
I want some race footage of the 199? YZ
I want to see the 75... for me that was the game changer... The mono-shock and extended travel. Boy that brings back memories. I have a 74 Honda Elsinore CR 250. the engine was excellent, and had good suspenders for the time, but within a few years the mono-shock and extended travel made my bike extinct. I had no problems until the track got too ruff, and the bikes with the newer suspenders would float over the track, while I was getting the crap beat out of me.
Without cash to buy a new bike, at the age of 15/16 I retired from racing..
but not from riding.
-
I want some race footage of the 199? YZ
I want to see the 75... for me that was the game changer... The mono-shock and extended travel. Boy that brings back memories. I have a 74 Honda Elsinore CR 250. the engine was excellent, and had good suspenders for the time, but within a few years the mono-shock and extended travel made my bike extinct. I had no problems until the track got too ruff, and the bikes with the newer suspenders would float over the track, while I was getting the crap beat out of me.
Without cash to buy a new bike, at the age of 15/16 I retired from racing..
but not from riding.
the bikes with the long travel suspension are what MADE the track get rough. ever notice that? when everything had 4 inches of travel, the breaking bumps never could get that big. when everyone instantly jumped to 8-10inches of travel, the tracks got more beat up.
-
I wouldnt let it being a 92 matter one bit . It's modern enough to compete with any newer mx'r . I wasnt saying that to make you feel like you have an old bike . I was just stateing that so you could have a definite year .
No I know, I understand. I said it once before in some other thread, but I don't get why people make such a big deal over years. If you get the engine done every season or so, its like a whole new engine. Especially with Yamaha, the design hasn't changed much from the 90's, I mean the frame is different, but the engine hasn't changed a whole lot except for the power valve, so it doesn't bother me one bit hahaha
Fact of the matter is most people who ride couldnt ride a 1985 yz250 to its full potential . I love getting out on the track on practice nights with my girls 91 cr125 , has no problem keeping up with 00+ 125's and the suspension is pretty damn good for being older . I like older bikes personally . I want a mid 80's 250 real bad
-
I like older bikes personally . I want a mid 80's 250 real bad Evil
The only problem with buying older bikes is getting the occasional lemon, which I think is actually what keeps people away from buying some.
-
Back in the mid '70s you had to have "this years bike". One year down was a serious disadvantage in those days! The suspension development was breathtaking. From 4" in '74 to 11.5 or even 12 is '79. Travel has not changed much since then (although quality sure has).
I want some race footage of the 199? YZ
I want to see the 75... for me that was the game changer... The mono-shock and extended travel. Boy that brings back memories. I have a 74 Honda Elsinore CR 250. the engine was excellent, and had good suspenders for the time, but within a few years the mono-shock and extended travel made my bike extinct. I had no problems until the track got too ruff, and the bikes with the newer suspenders would float over the track, while I was getting the crap beat out of me.
Without cash to buy a new bike, at the age of 15/16 I retired from racing..
but not from riding.
-
One of the YZ's that I always thought was very cool looking, 1979 YZ250F (yes, F)
-
I had a 78 YZ400 with a motor built for flat track (maximum HP).
I was about 14 and weighed about 105lbs. That thing would make a man out of you. I called it "Leroy"
-
I like the stock 92 models.
i like the color and the shape of the plastic
-
This was about 1995, long before WoW was thought of. Emig was on Yamahas and MC was trying to three-peat.